News Tesla's new statement on fatal crash doubles down on driver error

20:36  12 april  2018
20:36  12 april  2018 Source:   CNET

Collector Commissions His Own Tesla Model S Wagon

  Collector Commissions His Own Tesla Model S Wagon <p>Two Dutch specialists are doing what Musk hasn't, joining forces to create a shooting brake out of an existing Tesla Model S.</p>Floris de Raadt, a car collector who specializes in shooting brakes, put in the request to RemetzCar, a Netherlands-based company that typically builds limousines from luxury vehicles. RemetzCar previously built a custom Model S hearse, so this isn't the company's first time dealing with a Tesla. Remetz enlisted the help of London-based Dutch designer Niels van Roij to craft the shape of the vehicle while maintaining its battery-electric powertrain. Which Model S or battery pack was used was not specified, however.

Federal regulators are investigating Tesla ' s autopilot feature after a fatal crash involving a tractor trailer and one of its Model S cars. "This is the first known fatality in just over 130 million miles where Autopilot was activated," Tesla said in a statement Thursday.

"The driver had received several visual and one audible hands-on warning earlier in the drive and the driver 's Autopilot reduces crash rates by as much as 40 per cent, Tesla ' s statement said. A person driving a Tesla with Autopilot hardware is 3.7 times less likely to be involved in a fatal accident.

a group of people standing next to a car: download-4© Provided by CBS Interactive Inc. download-4

Tesla is very confident that its Autopilot suite of semi-autonomous driver aids is safe. So much so, in fact, that its latest statement in the wake of a fatal crash has earned its fair share of criticism.

After the family of Walter Huang went on a California ABC affiliate to discuss the Tesla Model X crash that took his life, the company sent out a statement. As with past statements, Tesla touted the benefits of Autopilot while casting the blame on Huang for allegedly missing warnings and not paying attention while operating the system.

"The crash happened on a clear day with several hundred feed of visibility ahead, which means that the only way for this incident to have occurred is if Mr. Huang was not paying attention to the road, despite the car providing multiple warnings to do so," the statement reads in part.

Waymo Adds Jaguar I-Pace EVs to Lineup, Unveils Plans to Launch Self-Driving Ride-Hailing Service

  Waymo Adds Jaguar I-Pace EVs to Lineup, Unveils Plans to Launch Self-Driving Ride-Hailing Service Waymo Adds Jaguar I-Pace EVs to Lineup, Unveils Plans to Launch Self-Driving Ride-Hailing Service Uber’s self-driving vehicles this week were indefinitely suspended from driving on Arizona roads, but Waymo’s autonomous-vehicle program using self-driving Chrysler Pacifica minivans, on the other hand, is gaining momentum in the state. Company executives said Tuesday they intend to launch commercial ride-hailing services by the end of the year in Phoenix, a city that has served as the nexus for Waymo’s early-rider program and as a public proving ground over the past 12 months.

Driver error and an overreliance on vehicle automation were the probable cause of the fatal Tesla crash in Florida last year. “System safeguards were lacking,” NTSB Chairman Robert Zumwalt said today in statement .

The U.S. National Transportation Safety Board ruled today that the “operational design” of Tesla ’ s Autopilot played a key role in a 2016 fatal crash that left the owner of a Model S dead. The vehicle’s semi-autonomous system permitted the driver

The statement also reiterated Autopilot's reliance on a human failsafe. "Tesla is extremely clear that Autopilot requires the driver to be alert and have hands on the wheel," the statement continues. "If the system detects that hands are not on, it provides visual and auditory alerts. This happened several times on Mr. Huang's drive that day." The statement is available in full on ABC 7 News' website.

Bloomberg talked to several experts in various corners of the industry about Tesla's current position, and the responses offered up criticism of Tesla's system for not doing enough to prevent driver misuse, in addition to lambasting Tesla's latest response for relying on the same doubling-down tactic that it's used in responses to previous, similar events.

Uber Reportedly Disabled Key Safety Feature Prior to Deadly Crash

  Uber Reportedly Disabled Key Safety Feature Prior to Deadly Crash The company may have been working on proprietary safety measures which required it to disable third-party software.The fatal crash that claimed the life of a 49-year-old woman when an Uber self-driving vehicle collided with the pedestrian in Tempe, Arizona may have been preventable according to the company responsible for one of the key technologies developed for the autonomous Volvo.

“ODI has identified, from information provided by Tesla and from other sources, a report of a fatal highway crash Here’s Tesla ’ s statement in full: “We learned yesterday evening that NHTSA is opening a Actually, most of the deaths in the GM ignition cases were due to DRIVER ERROR .

Here’s Tesla ’ s full statement , titled “A Tragic Loss.” We learned yesterday evening that NHTSA is opening a preliminary evaluation into the performance of Autopilot during a recent fatal crash that occurred in a Model S. This is It then gradually slows down the car until hands-on is detected again.

The National Transportation Safety Board investigation is ongoing, so official blame has not yet been cast. Reuters reports that Huang's family has hired a law firm to explore its options, and that law firm believes that Autopilot is at least partially to blame, because its system might have misread the lane markings on that particular stretch of highway.

This was originally published on Roadshow.


Research the Tesla Model X on MSN Autos | Find a Tesla Model X near you

Follow MSN Autos on Facebook and Twitter

Tesla hit hard by new Chinese tariffs .
American-made cars will see import duties double in China.Previously, US-built vehicles brought into China were hit with a 25 percent import duty, but under the new regulations an additional 25 percent would be piled on. With a 50 percent tariff in place, the price tag for American-made vehicles would likely be pushed out of reach for a large part of the Chinese car-buying public.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!