Opinion The Republicans’ tax wager is worth the gamble

00:46  08 december  2017
00:46  08 december  2017 Source:   MSN

My fellow Republicans, a Democratic wave is coming unless we act right now

  My fellow Republicans, a Democratic wave is coming unless we act right now Republicans lost Tuesday in an Alabama U.S. Senate race for the first time in 25 years. Republicans lost the Virginia governorship last month, despite Ed Gillespie getting more votes than any Republican gubernatorial candidate in the state’s history. The GOP also lost 14 Virginia House of Delegates seats, and four races are still being recounted – enough for Republicans to potentially lose control after 17 years in the majority.In New Jersey, an unpopular Republican governor doomed the GOP candidate to a decisive defeat with 42 percent of the vote.

Washington — The Republicans ’ tax legislation is built on economic projections that are as confidently as they are cheerfully made concerning the legislation’s shaping effect on the economy over the next ten years.

4, 2017, photo, part of the Republican Senate bill " Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" is photographed in Washington. Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans ’ equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

Steve Daines et al. posing for the camera: Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) squeezed into a Capitol Hill elevator to go vote on amendments to the GOP tax overhaul. © J. Scott Applewhite/AP Sen. Steve Daines (R-Mont.) squeezed into a Capitol Hill elevator to go vote on amendments to the GOP tax overhaul. Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

The Republicans' tax legislation is built on economic projections that are as confidently as they are cheerfully made concerning the legislation's shaping effect on the economy over the next 10 years. This claim to prescience must amaze alumni of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, which were 85 and 158 years old, respectively, when they expired less than 10 years ago in the unanticipated Great Recession.

Bannon at Moore rally: 'Special place in hell for Republicans who should know better'

  Bannon at Moore rally: 'Special place in hell for Republicans who should know better' Stephen Bannon on Monday called out GOP leaders who have failed to support Alabama Senate candidate Roy Moore, telling a crowd at a rally for the special election candiate that there is "special place in hell for Republicans who should know better."Bannon, President Trump's former campaign chief and senior strategist, took aim at Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Alabama Sen. Richard Shelby (R) and form er Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice during a campaign rally the night before Moore faces off against Democrat Doug Jones."Mitch McConnell and Sen.

The Republicans purport to know how changed tax incentives will affect corporations’ and individuals’ decisions, and how those Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans ’ equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

The Republicans purport to know how changed tax incentives will affect corporations’ and individuals’ decisions, and how those Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans ’ equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

The predictions of gross domestic product and revenue growth assume, among many other things, continuation of the current expansion. It began in June 2009 and has been notable for its anemia relative to other post-1945 expansions: Its average annual growth rate has been 2 percent; theirs, 4.3 percent. But it also has been remarkably durable. It is 102 months old; the average since after World War II is 58 months. Unless the business cycle has been repealed, a recession is almost a certainty during the 10-year window for which the tax bill has been tailored.

What the legislation's drafters anticipate, indeed proclaim, is that Congress will not allow to happen what the legislation says, with a wink, will happen. So, this might mark the historic moment when Washington decided that it no longer will bother to blush. The legislation says the tax reductions for individuals will expire by 2025. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, however, says "we have every expectation that down the road Congress will extend them." Of course Congress will. The phantom expiration is an $800 billion fudge, a cooking of the books in order to cram the tax bill into conformity with arcane parliamentary procedures that make the measure immune to filibuster. We have been down this road before: For the same reason, some George W. Bush tax cuts of 2001 were scheduled to expire at the end of 2010; 82 percent of them (measured by revenue) did not.

Democrats made a bet on Trump that just paid off — bigly

  Democrats made a bet on Trump that just paid off — bigly <p>With two weeks to spare, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has already raised twice as much money online this year as it did in 2015, officials said.</p>Many liberal and Democratic groups have seen a flood of donations since Trump's election. But the DCCC, whose apocalyptic fundraising emails reporters and political operatives love to hate, gave NBC News a rare look inside the mechanics of monetizing the Trump backlash.

The Republicans ’ tax plan is a gamble and it’s still worth taking. Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans ’ equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

The Republicans ’ tax legislation is built on economic projections that are as confidently as they are cheerfully made concerning the legislation’s shaping effect on the economy over the next 10 years. This claim to prescience must amaze alumni of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers

Subscribe to the Post Most newsletter: Today’s most popular stories on The Washington Post

The Democrats' denunciation of the Republicans' tax cuts because they especially benefit the wealthy is a recyclable denunciation of any significant tax cut. The top 1 percent of earners supply 39 percent of income tax revenue, the top 10 percent supply 70 percent, the bottom 50 percent supply 3 percent, 60 percent of households pay either no income taxes (45 percent) or less than 5 percent of their income, and 62 percent of Americans pay more in payroll taxes than in income taxes. So, any tax cut significant to macroeconomic policy — any that might change incentives sufficiently to substantially change businesses' and individuals' behaviors — must be primarily a cut for the affluent.

Democrats pretend to worry that Republicans are executing a diabolical double play, using tax cuts to placate donors, then citing the cuts' enlargement of the national debt as an excuse to cut entitlements. Surely Democrats know that Republicans are not insubordinate to their president, who has vowed to oppose any significant (i.e., touching Social Security or Medicare) entitlement reforms. Besides, whenever Republicans run large budget deficits — the tax legislation probably means that the next decade's will be even larger than they would have been — they serve the Democrats' basic agenda: They legitimize the bipartisan penchant for making big government seem cheap. Republicans, too, give people $X worth of government services and charge the recipients $Y, with Y significantly less than X.

Trump after NK launch: US will 'take care of it'

  Trump after NK launch: US will 'take care of it' Trump says 'we will take care of it' following North Korea's latest missile launch, offers no details.Trump told reporters Tuesday that "it is a situation that we will handle.

The Republicans purport to know how changed tax incentives will affect corporations’ and individuals’ decisions, and how those Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans ’ equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

Fire map: Southern California’s big four, including new one in Bel Air. Opinion. George Will: Why GOP tax wager is worth the gamble . Republicans , too, give people $X worth of government services and charge the recipients $Y, with Y significantly less than X.

In 2002, when Dick Cheney — a strict constructionist, but not of economic data — said "Reagan proved deficits don't matter," the publicly held national debt was 33 percent the size of GDP; today it is 75 percent. At some point, the debt's size matters, and we seem determined to learn the hard way where that point is.

This tax legislation, an amalgam of earnest hoping and transparent make-believe, is a serious lunge for sustained 3 percent growth. Without this, the economy, and hence the entitlement state, will buckle beneath the strain of 10,000 of the elderly each day becoming eligible for Social Security and Medicare. The Republicans purport to know how changed tax incentives will affect corporations' and individuals' decisions, and how those decisions will radiate through the economy. Republicans do not know — nobody, including the Republicans' equally overconfident critics, does — but they might be right, and their wager is worth trying.

Economics is a science of incentives, and like all sciences it is never "settled." Both sides, with their thumping predictions, have given hostages to the future, which will deal harshly with some. Perhaps most. Possibly all of them.

Read more from George F. Will's archive or follow him on Facebook.

This Might Be The Moment Khloe Kardashian Finally Confirms She's Pregnant .
For reality TV fans, the Kardashians just released the equivalent to the “Avengers: Infinity War” trailer. Months have gone by with nary a peep about Khloe Kardashian and Kylie Jenner’s reported pregnancies from a family famous for over-sharing. But it looks like all that is about to change when “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” returns in January with a new batch of episodes. In a goosebumps-worthy promo clip released on Thursday, friends and family are gathering at what appears to be a party to announce that Khloe is expecting.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!