Opinion Pandora’s Box 2020: The Threat Of Routine Nuclear Warfare

19:36  19 april  2017
19:36  19 april  2017 Source:   The Daily Caller

US sends warships toward North Korea as a warning

  US sends warships toward North Korea as a warning Pivoting off what the White House considers a successful U.S. missile strike in Syria, the Trump administration sent a not-so-subtle message Sunday to North Korea: don't risk being next. With growing signs that North Korea Pyongyang may be preparing a sixth nuclear test, a U.S. aircraft carrier strike force near Singapore was diverted north toward the Korean peninsula, President Donald Trump spoke to leaders in Tokyo and Seoul, and senior administration officials made pointed note of the "full range of options" available to counter threats to the United States or its allies.

The first batch are planned to be finished by 2020 . As with drone strikes, the first time is the hardest to sell, and the special case becomes less special each time, to the point that casual nuclear strikes could, and likely rapidly would, become routine , bringing nuclear warfare into the world in a way that

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. The threat of nuclear weapons maintains the world peace. Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy. The benefits of nuclear technology far out-weight the disadvantages.

An unarmed Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missile was launched at 4:36 a.m. PST during an operational test Dec. 17, 2013, from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. The 30th Space Wing manages the Department of Defense's space and missile testing program, and launches satellites into polar orbit from the West Coast using expendable boosters. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Yvonne Morales/Released): 11469547345_7871cd15fe_o © Provided by The Daily Caller, Inc. 11469547345_7871cd15fe_o

In mid-April, US scientists announced that a test had recently and successfully been carried out on the B61-12 gravity bomb, a highly accurate, variable-yield replacement for the B61 nuclear bomb which has been a major part of America’s nuclear weapons arsenal since the late 1960s.

The B61-12 is said to be accurate to 30 meters, and its lowest yield settings give it a crater radius not much larger than that. Such bombs, officials say, could be set to lower yields while still destroying their intended target, lowering damage to the surrounding area, and limiting radioactive fallout. The first batch are planned to be finished by 2020.

Navy says no charges in drowning death during SEAL training

  Navy says no charges in drowning death during SEAL training The Navy says there will be no criminal charges in the drowning of a sailor who was repeatedly pushed underwater by an instructor during Navy SEAL basic training in California.A Navy statement Monday says Cmdr. Liam Hulin, head of the Naval Special Warfare Basic Training Command, made the decision to pursue no charges in the death of 21-year-old Seaman James Derek Lovelace.Hulin's conclusions came after his review of a Naval Criminal Investigative Service probe into Lovelace's death 11 months ago during a pool exercise near San Diego.The coroner ruled the death a homicide after finding Lovelace had been dunked at least twice by an instructor while struggling to tread water in full gear.

blog 'rickyridpath.blogdetik.com' is not exists. Glued to the Tube: The Threat of Television Addiction to Todays Family epub

The US. government has never seriously. considered giving up its nuclear . stockpile, or even renouncing a. first-use nuclear doctrine. for a first-strike, offensive nuclear war. against its enemies. Find out more about the nuclear threat .

While this pricey project is just a small fraction of a nuclear modernization scheme that will likely cost well over a trillion dollars before all is said and done, it is potentially the most dangerous, as the smaller usable yields make them substantially more usable for the US military, and risk the Pentagon believing they have the option to use “just a little nuke” here and there during warfare.

Today, a unilateral nuclear first strike would be considered an unthinkable action, turning the attacker into a global pariah overnight. Yet we have seen time and again that the bar for behavior in war is a rapidly drifting line, particularly in this era of constant US warfare.

The use of drones in warfare is a good example. In 2001 the United States conducted the first ever drone strike in Afghanistan, firing a Hellfire missile at a vehicle convoy. Just over two years later, the US carried out its first strike in a nation that they weren’t at war in, Pakistan. By President Obama’s early years, drone strikes in Pakistan had become commonplace, and by 2011, less than a decade after its first use, the US used a drone in Yemen to assassinate a US-born American citizen, Anwar Awlaki.

Navy says no charges in drowning death during SEAL training

  Navy says no charges in drowning death during SEAL training The Navy says there will be no criminal charges in the drowning of a sailor who was repeatedly pushed underwater by an instructor during Navy SEAL basic training in California.A Navy statement Monday says Cmdr. Liam Hulin, head of the Naval Special Warfare Basic Training Command, made the decision to pursue no charges in the death of 21-year-old Seaman James Derek Lovelace.Hulin's conclusions came after his review of a Naval Criminal Investigative Service probe into Lovelace's death 11 months ago during a pool exercise near San Diego.The coroner ruled the death a homicide after finding Lovelace had been dunked at least twice by an instructor while struggling to tread water in full gear.

WebCite®. [ What' s this? ] Showing WebCite for URL: [Permalink to this cache].

In reality, the Obama administration has simply reaffirmed and even extended the existing US nuclear policy allowing for a first-strike, offensive nuclear war against its enemies. Find out more about the nuclear threat in the new cold war in this week’ s GRTV Backgrounder TRANSCRIPT AND

The first time deployment for any significant new weapon is always a big deal. This was seen on April 13, when for the first time ever the US dropped the GBU-43/B MOAB, also called the “Mother of All Bombs.” The largest non-nuclear bomb ever used, this was dropped in Afghanistan, nominally to target ISIS, but with US officials mostly emphasizing the “message” its use sent to other nations the US is hostile toward.

And so it doubtless would be for the B61-12. The first use of a low-yield version of the nuclear bomb would be a media event, though judging from the cable news reaction to the MOAB, it would likely be presented mainly as an interesting event, and one which underscores the current president’s willingness to bring America’s military might to bear.

While the size of the effected region for a low-yield nuclear strike could be very limited indeed with the new bomb, even on its low settings the B61-12 is more than a factor of 1,000 more powerful than the MOAB. To make matters worse, the precedent of a low-yield bomb would doubtless carry over into  higher and higher settings.

U.S. Army Considers Super-Weapon to Counter Russia

  U.S. Army Considers Super-Weapon to Counter Russia The Kinetic Energy Projectile launches a tungsten-based missile at Mach 3 that delivers a "devastating" load of hot metal fragments.Called the Kinetic Energy Projectile, the weapon is a tungsten-based warhead launched at more than three times the speed of sound that bursts into numerous flaming, metal fragments easily capable of piercing most conventional types of armor, according to Aviation Week. The Army is looking into fitting the new super-weapon onto existing launch platforms that are capable of supplying sufficient charge to shoot the projectile at such speeds.

Pandora ' s Box . Text only version. Has your curiosity ever got you into trouble? There was one very, very important condition however, that she must never opened the box . Pandora was very curious about the contents of the box but she had promised that she would never open it.

Implications of the Recent Deal With Iran on Getting Controls on Civilian Nuclear Fuel Cycles. By FAS. Director of the Arms Sales Monitoring Project Matt Schroeder assesses the terrorist threat from MANPADS and efforts by the international community to curb this threat .

Indeed, it isn’t hard to suppose that while the first nuclear strike would be a media curiosity, the second strike would be dramatically less so, and with a few more deployments into a few different military theaters, of which the US is never short, low-yield nuclear strikes could easily become as routine as US drone strikes assassinating unnamed “suspects” overseas.

Obviously, I’m not the first person that has thought of this, nor is the Air Force blind to the potential of having nuclear weapons with a much lower usage threshold. Terrifyingly enough, the Air Force has presented this as a major selling point for the B61-12.

Former Air Force Chief of Staff Norton Schwartz argued that this practical usability would greatly increase the deterrent impact of the bomb to America’s nuclear arsenal, since other nations would believe the US would be more likely to use such accurate bombs in minor engagements.

Unspoken in this is that they would be correct in believing so. While America’s extent nuclear stockpile is virtually unusable in anything short of a civilization-ending nuclear exchange, and it would be unfathomable to imagine the US dropping any of its current nuclear weapons in Afghanistan, Libya, or Yemen, officials would doubtless argue that a “special case” use of a 50 kiloton bomb on a fortification could be easily justified.

This Russian RoboSoldier Can Fire a Glock With Each ‘Hand’

  This Russian RoboSoldier Can Fire a Glock With Each ‘Hand’ With heightened tensions around the world, the Russians have released a video of what could be a component of remotely fought conflicts -- a robot that can fire the handguns it is gripping in each claw. Related: This ‘Baby’ Robot Tank Could Be the Future of Armored Warfare for the US The humanoid packing a pair of 9mm Glocks may not be on the same level as the missiles North Korea had on parade last weekend or the “mother of all bombs” that the U.S. dropped on ISIS fighters holed up in Afghanistan on Apr. 13, but it seems to be yet another example of increasingly bellicose nations showing off their latest armaments. The Russian RoboSoldier FEDOR (Final Experimental Demonstration Object Research) can be seen in videos posted on Twitter by an official of the Putin government blasting away at targets. According to a translation of one tweet by the website RT of a Russian channel that is said to be controlled by the Kremlin, Vice Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin wrote, “A robot of the F.E.D.O.R. platform has shown skills of shooting with both hands. Work is underway on fine motor skills and decision-making algorithms.” RT says FEDOR can already “use keys, extinguish a fire, drive a car and use a saw and a welding machine.” Related: Why Swarms of Cheap, Disposable Drones Could Be the Future of Warfare About a year ago, an Israeli company unveiled a lightweight, remotely operated ground-combat robot that’s about the size of a robotic vacuum cleaner and can climb stairs. It also can fire a Glock, but just one. And around the same time, videos emerged of drones that have been rigged up to fire handguns. Maybe what’s next is an artificially intelligent RoboSoldier that can shoot, carry a small ground-combat unit in its backpack and call in armed drone strikes.

Last month’ s nuclear security summit at the Hague saw the usual politicians spouting the usual platitudes about the need to reduce the threat of nuclear warfare . But this was far from your average nuclear security summit.

The US government has never seriously considered giving up its nuclear stockpile, or even renouncing a first-use nuclear doctrine. Find out more about the nuclear threat in the new cold war in this week’ s GRTV Backgrounder with James Corbett.

As with drone strikes, the first time is the hardest to sell, and the special case becomes less special each time, to the point that casual nuclear strikes could, and likely rapidly would, become routine, bringing nuclear warfare into the world in a way that the Cold War never could.

The danger of this is palpable, as once strikes nuclear strikes start happening, there is no stopping them, and the trend will everywhere and always be bigger bombs and lower barriers to usage. Every proxy war would be likely to “go nuclear” in short order, and quickly escalate out of control.

The solution to this is a straightforward one – the United States must make a declaration of no first use of nuclear weapons. Such a declaration would have ample precedent: both China and India have pledged no first use, and the Soviet Union made a similar pledge.

As recently as last year, President Obama was discussing making a similar declaration on behalf of the United States, but military officials and cabinet hawks shouted him down, arguing that a pledge of no US nuclear first strikes would harm America’s military credibility.

The argument scared Obama away from the declaration, but was of course nonsense. A nuclear first strike is not an expression of a nation’s military credibility, but rather is an act of either desperation or lawless, naked aggression.

As the world’s leading nuclear power, a US no-first-use pledge would go a long way toward convincing other nations to follow suit, and would commit America’s credibility to not going down the path of reckless nuclear aggression, providing at least some assurance that US governments would not take advantage of the B61-12 to conduct small nuclear first strikes against non-nuclear states or random insurgencies.

Jason Ditz is news editor at Antiwar.com, a nonprofit organization dedicated to the cause of non-interventionism. His work has appeared in Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times and Detroit Free Press.

Trump ridicules Warren: 'Pocahontas' may run for president in 2020 .
"And she is not big on the NRA, that I can tell you," Trump said.In his speech, Trump warned NRA members that a Warren presidency would be bad for Second Amendment rights.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!