Opinion Gregg Jarrett: Mueller has shrewdly 'stacked the deck' against Trump

18:40  11 august  2017
18:40  11 august  2017 Source:   FOX News

Senate introduces two bills to protect Mueller from Trump firing

  Senate introduces two bills to protect Mueller from Trump firing The Senate can agree on one cause: Saving Robert Mueller. Senators unveiled two bipartisan bills Thursday to protect Mueller, the special counsel leading the federal probe into the Trump campaign, from a potential firing by President Trump.

And so, the deck has been shrewdly stacked against President Trump . Robert Mueller has dealt from the bottom of the deck . There is no bluffing in this game. Gregg Jarrett is a Fox News Anchor and former defense attorney.

- breaking news -. Politics. Gregg Jarrett : Mueller Has Shrewdly ' Stacked the Deck ' Against Trump . It appears that this is the way special counsel Robert Mueller has approached his investigation. Consider the evidence.

  Gregg Jarrett: Mueller has shrewdly 'stacked the deck' against Trump © Provided by Fox News

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

suitlady
Debt Escape Plan: Pay No Interest Until 2019
Do You Qualify?
Sponsored by CompareCards

Cheating in a game of cards can involve “stacking the deck” –arranging the cards in a way that advantages yourself while ensuring your opponent loses.

It appears that this is the way special counsel Robert Mueller has approached his investigation. Consider the evidence.

Mueller chose, of all places, the venue of Washington, D.C., to convene a grand jury to examine evidence in the Russia-Trump investigation. It would be difficult to find a group of people more hostile to Trump than in the nation’s capital. The president garnered a scant four percent of the vote there, compared to Hillary Clinton’s 93 percent.

Lawmaker: Trump firing Mueller ‘would cross a big line’

  Lawmaker: Trump firing Mueller ‘would cross a big line’ Sen. Chris Coons (D-Conn.) issued a stark warning to President Trump on Sunday, saying firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller would cross a line and spur bipartisan pushback in the Senate. "I think if the president should fire Robert Mueller abruptly, that would be crossing a big line, and I think you would be seeing strong bipartisan action from the Senate which might include our reinstating him or our hiring him to continue to conduct that investigation on behalf of Congress," Coons said on "ABC This Week." Coon's comments come after he and Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.

They will be met with fire and fury like the world has never seen.”—President Trump Tuesday. Trending in Opinion. Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump .

 Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ‘ stacked the deck ’ against Trump . Petition the White House to institute Edward Snowden, National Whistleblower – Patriots against Government Corruption Day. URGENT!

There was already a grand jury convened in Virginia looking into the related Michael Flynn matter and Mueller could have easily presented his case there. But no, that would run the risk of being potentially fair to the president since the jurors there are more apt to be politically bipartisan. So, from the outset, Mueller dealt himself a highace on his way to a royal flush.

His next card, a king, is the grand jury process itself. Over time, this Fifth Amendment principle has devolved into a one-sided farce, favoring only the prosecution. Defense attorneys are not allowed inside what has become a secret “star chamber, permitting no adverse party to challenge the truth and credibility of witnesses through the test of cross-examination. It gets worse.

Senate bill would require court's approval for Trump firing Mueller

  Senate bill would require court's approval for Trump firing Mueller GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Democratic Sen. Cory Booker (N.J.) are moving to limit the Trump administration's ability to fire Robert Mueller as the latter investigates any potential ties between Russia and the Trump campaign.The legislation would require a judge to approve a Justice Department request to fire Mueller or any other special counsel. Any appeal of that decision would go to the Supreme Court, according to th e bill. "Our bill allows judicial review of any decision to terminate a special counsel to make sure it's done for the reasons cited in the regulation rather than political motivation.

Trending in Opinion. Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump . Trump won't let North Korea nuke Sarah Palin's backyard.

Far more prudent is to patiently probe their vulnerabilities and to leverage the strengths of adversaries against them. Trending in Opinion. Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump .

There are no enforceable rules of evidence during grand jury proceedings, which means that otherwise inadmissible hearsay or double-hearsay is perfectly acceptable. Unauthenticated documents are copacetic. Prosecutors are free to present only incriminating evidence, to the exclusion of exculpatory evidence.  All too often grand jurors simply rubber-stamp a prosecutor’s instructions. Thus, the old saying, “you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.”

With no meaningful limits on abusive tactics, the entire system is anathema to fairness.  A grand jury is to justice what military music is to music.  It bears no resemblance. My apologies to John Philip Sousa, but you get the point. This is precisely why grand juries, which were once in vogue everywhere, have now been banished in all nations except the United States and Liberia.

Mueller’s queen card is the Obama-appointed judge likely overseeing the D.C. grand jury. Under local court rules, Chief U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell is the one who presides over decisions on grand jury subpoenas, witness testimony, any executive privilege and possible Fifth Amendment assertions. In the past, she worked closely with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and one of Mueller’s top staff lawyers, Andrew Weissman.

White House lawyer Cobb predicts quick end to Mueller probe

  White House lawyer Cobb predicts quick end to Mueller probe <p>The White House lawyer brought in to deal with special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 election said he believed the focus of the probe was "narrow" and the aspects related to President Donald Trump should be completed before the end of the year.</p>The lawyer, Ty Cobb, who joined the White House staff on July 31, made the comments in interviews with Reuters on Tuesday and Wednesday. He declined to provide specifics backing his outlook, which contradicts media reports that the scope of Mueller’s probe is expanding and the views of several outside experts that the investigation is likely to continue well into 2018.

On Tuesday, President Trump outlined some of his plans for dealing with our opiate epidemic, which took the lives of more than 50,000 Americans during 2015 and will likely cost many more lives this year. Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump .

Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump . Naked illegal alien panhandlers turning Times Square into shocking anti -family zone. John Stossel: New York City locks up people for carrying guns legally licensed by other states.

Indeed, Howell and Weissman co-authored a scholarly law article that explored obstruction of justice… which just happens to be part of what Mueller is reportedly investigating in the Russia-Trump case. Betsy Woodruff of the Daily Beast uncovered this nugget. A conflict of interest? Surely. But don’t expect a judicial recusal anytime soon, even though Judge Howell teaches ethics at American University’s law school.

Dealing himself a jack, Mueller has chosen to hire for his staff an unconscionable number of lawyers of the liberal persuasion. Out of 14 lawyers retained thus far, eight have donated to Democrats while none appear to have contributed a nickel to Republicans. Several of Mueller’s lawyers gave generously to “Hillary for America,” while another actually represented the Clinton Foundation. The special counsel could have selected a more balanced team devoid of partisan ties, but he deliberately chose not to do so.

Finally, Mueller is holding a precious ten card in the very man who hired him, Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General who authored the infamous memo advising President Trump to fire FBI Director James Comey. In any obstruction case arising therefrom, Rosenstein would be a prosecutor, investigator and witness all rolled into one. Despite his glaring conflict of interest, Rosenstein has made no move to step aside. Which means he is unlikely to fire Mueller for his own similar conflict of interest.

Lawmaker: Trump firing Mueller ‘would cross a big line’

  Lawmaker: Trump firing Mueller ‘would cross a big line’ Sen. Chris Coons (D-Conn.) issued a stark warning to President Trump on Sunday, saying firing Special Counsel Robert Mueller would cross a line and spur bipartisan pushback in the Senate. "I think if the president should fire Robert Mueller abruptly, that would be crossing a big line, and I think you would be seeing strong bipartisan action from the Senate which might include our reinstating him or our hiring him to continue to conduct that investigation on behalf of Congress," Coons said on "ABC This Week.

Gregg Jarrett : Mueller has shrewdly ' stacked the deck ' against Trump . 3. California billionaire ordered to restore public access to .5M beachfront property.

Subscribe to email blast feed. Showing up matters: how does your school district stack up?

As explained in previous columns, Mueller’s close relationship to the key witness, James Comey, creates a disqualifying conflict of interest specifically forbidden by the special counsel law itself (28 CFR 600.7 and 45.2), not to mention the Code of Professional Responsibility which governs the conduct of lawyers. Their record as longtime friends, allies and partners is well-documented and indisputable.

It is inconceivable that Mueller could be completely impartial in judging the credibility of his friend versus the president who fired his friend in deciding whether to pursue a charge of obstruction.  Even scrupulously honest people can be influenced in ways they do not recognize themselves.  This is exactly why there are legal and ethical rules that demand recusal based on prior relationships.  Even the appearance of a conflict is sufficient for recusal.  But Mueller remains on the job.

And so, the deck has been shrewdly stacked against President Trump.  Robert Mueller has dealt from the bottom of the deck.  There is a lot at stake on the table.

The only good hand the president may have requires a trump card called innocence.  Does he have it?

There is no bluffing in this game.

Russia special counsel Mueller using multiple grand juries .
Russia special counsel Robert Mueller is using at least two grand juries – in Virginia and Washington, D.C. – to advance wide-ranging federal inquiry into possible coordination between President Trump's campaign and Moscow, a lawyer involved in the case said Friday.&nbsp;WASHINGTON – Russia special counsel Robert Mueller is using at least two grand juries – in Virginia and Washington, D.C. – to advance wide-ranging federal inquiry into possible coordination between President Trump's campaign and Moscow, a lawyer involved in the case said Friday.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks
This is interesting!