Opinion Why do Democrats want to dump the Electoral College?

18:25  12 september  2017
18:25  12 september  2017 Source:   FOX News

Record Percentage of Americans Support Gay Marriage, Poll Finds

  Record Percentage of Americans Support Gay Marriage, Poll Finds <p>The percentage of Americans who support same-sex marriage has reached a record high, according to the latest NBC News/Wall Street Journal "Social Trends" poll.</p>Sixty percent of those polled say they support same-sex marriage, which is up from 59 percent in 2015 and 53 percent in 2013. Thirty-three percent say they oppose same-sex marriage, with the remaining respondents saying either it "depends" or they are "not sure.

Honest Democrats will admit that this proposal is being advanced only because we lost in 2016. Had it been Hillary Clinton who won the Electoral College while losing the popular vote, we wouldn’t be pushing for this “elegant” solution. The far left wants to abolish this system. Why ?

Translated into ratios, the popular vote for the Democrat 's candidate is 53% of the total; for the Republican's candidate 47%; while the electoral college apportions 68% of its total to Obama and 32% to McCain. Why would small states not want elector al college abolished?

  Why do Democrats want to dump the Electoral College? © Provided by Fox News

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

In the midst of Hurricanes Harvey and Irma, many Americans have likely missed coverage of a growing storm in the world of politics. It’s a scheme recently promoted by the far left of the Democratic Party – including the New York Times and activist Michael Moore – to deny President Trump reelection in 2020.

Their plan? Cheat.

To understand how, we need to first remember a quirk of American democracy.

Most of us will recall that the U.S. constitution doesn’t allow its citizens to directly elect our president. Instead, an Electoral College assembles every four years and selects the nation’s leader. This unconventional College, with members from all 50 states and the District of Columbia, is technically free to vote for whomever it wants. However, in practice, these members – also called electors – almost always vote for the candidate that wins their home state.

Hillary Clinton still doesn’t get ‘what happened’ in the 2016 election

  Hillary Clinton still doesn’t get ‘what happened’ in the 2016 election Working-class voters had legitimate grievances that Democrats ignored. That sent a message to working-class voters that Democrats are not focused on fighting for them. So they defected. Add to this Clinton’s inability to connect with her party’s liberal base (the so-called drop-off voters who turned out for Obama but failed to show up for her) — plus the Clinton Foundation and her repeated lies about her personal server, which led large majorities of Americans to conclude that she was dishonest and corrupt — and you had the toxic brew that produced her electoral defeat.

All of this uproar concerning the Electoral College raises two questions: First, why didn't Democrats vote for this when they had 60 votes in the Senate and a nice majority in the House, circa 2009-2010?

You want to change the results the Electoral College produces, the place to look is the parties themselves, and how narrowly ideologically drawn they currently Democrats got the popular vote in 2000 and 2016, but not the electoral college – why don't they campaign for another electoral system?

In other words, if Trump wins Michigan, the state’s electors will almost always vote for him in the Electoral College (even though they don’t have to).

The far left wants to abolish this system. Why? As Moore recently argued, Trump will probably win reelection if we keep the Electoral College (which he won 304-227 in 2016). If, however, the country were to replace it with a national popular vote, a Democrat would stand a much better chance of victory.

Indeed, Hillary Clinton beat Trump by nearly three million total votes in 2016.

In normal times, dumping the Electoral College would require a constitutional amendment. However, the far left is advocating for what it calls an “elegant” runaround – officially labeled the Interstate Compact – where states pool their electors for whichever candidate wins the national vote irrespective of their state’s vote.

Hillary Clinton: Time to abolish the Electoral College

  Hillary Clinton: Time to abolish the Electoral College Hillary Clinton told CNN on Wednesday that it is time to abolish the Electoral College, part of a sweeping interview about why she lost the 2016 election . Clinton, in the interview with CNN's Anderson Cooper, displayed her animus for fired FBI Director James Comey, reflected on her love for the people -- namely former President Bill Clinton -- who helped her get through the crushing loss and blasted the arcane election body that she believes helped Donald Trump win the presidency."I think it needs to be eliminated," Clinton said of the Electoral College. "I'd like to see us move beyond it, yes.

It’s been a common refrain from many Democrats in the weeks since the presidential election : Get rid of the Electoral College . The people have spoken, they claim, so why is their candidate made to suffer because of an “antiquated” system such as the Electoral College ?

I'm Leaning Toward Dumping the Electoral College , Too. It had one job. Most Popular. Getty Angelo Merendino. By Charles P. Pierce. Dec 8, 2016. (Optional Musical Accompaniment To This Post). There's a genuinely bizarre—and genuinely dangerous—line of thought being promulgated by those

Let’s take an example. Had the compact been in place in 2016, electors in states like Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania would have been forced to vote for Clinton even though Trump won their home states. Why? Clinton won more total national votes.

As of this writing, 11 states and their legislatures have signed on to the Interstate Compact. If the effort attracts a few more states that represent 105 Electoral College votes, the scheme goes into effect.

Not surprisingly, some of my fellow Democrats are tempted by this plan, including former Vice President Al Gore. However there are at least four reasons why the party and its sensible members must loudly and publicly reject this illicit compact.

We Lost. Move on. Honest Democrats will admit that this proposal is being advanced only because we lost in 2016. Had it been Hillary Clinton who won the Electoral College while losing the popular vote, we wouldn’t be pushing for this “elegant” solution. That hypocrisy should remind us that cooler heads must prevail. Our democracy and its constitution are not playthings to be discarded when a political party doesn’t get their way.

Analysis: Why the Electoral College isn't going anywhere

  Analysis: Why the Electoral College isn't going anywhere Hillary Clinton is no fan of the Electoral College. "I think it needs to be eliminated," Clinton told CNN's Anderson Cooper on Wednesday night. "I'd like to see us move beyond it, yes." Here's the thing: That ain't happening. You wouldn't know that from listening to Democrats, who are absolutely up in arms following the second presidential election of the past five in which the winner of the popular vote didn't win the White House. (Both losers were Democrats.)Here's a quick Electoral College Cliffs Notes: Basically, when you vote you aren't really voting for Donald Trump or Clinton.

I want to talk you about the Electoral College and why it matters. Well, sort of. But he really won the election because he managed to flip one state which the Democrats thought was safe: West Virginia.

It doesn't matter: The Electoral College now favors the Democrats . Julie Gutman Dickinson, Capital & Main. America is the No. 1 arms dealer: Yet why do trends in weapon exports remain in relative obscurity?

Bad Candidate: While supporters of the compact highlight that Clinton won more total votes than Trump, they fail to mention that 14 Democratic nominees before her have managed to win the Electoral College – and thus the presidency. That includes a biracial man named Barack Hussein Obama who won twice during the nation’s war on Islamic terror.

In other words, Democrats didn’t have an Electoral College problem in 2016. We had a candidate problem. Our constitution shouldn’t bear the burden of punishment for the mistake we Democrats made in nominating a deeply flawed individual.

It’s (Likely) Unconstitutional: The far left makes no mention that the Supreme Court would likely find the compact unconstitutional if it were adopted. Indeed, our founding documents specifically prohibit political compacts between states where it either erodes federal power or that of states not in agreement.

While the Supreme Court’s ultimate ruling is debatable, it’s clear that this particular compact is exclusively political in nature and would not have the support of all (or even most) states. Additionally, it’s wholly designed to be an end run around how Americans are supposed to change or abolish the Electoral College, namely through the constitutional amendment process.

The Time Has Come: Reform the Electoral College Now

  The Time Has Come: Reform the Electoral College Now The founders created the Electoral College, but the states made it winner-take-all. And that's the Achilles Heel where a new group has aimed its arrow.At the core of a democracy lies a simple principle—that votes should count equally. Whether you’re white or black, rich or poor, or from Rapid City or Cedar Rapids, your vote should count the same as the vote of anyone else. “One person,” as this ideal gets expressed, “one vote.

Why do we have such a procedure? It goes back to our founders' distrust of democracy . The reason lies in the evils of our federal system. Under the electoral college structure, smaller states have enormous political leverage.

Electoral College Favors Democrats . By Pat L. Garofalo, Contributor |Nov. 5, 2012, at 3:12 p.m. [See a collection of political cartoons on the 2012 campaign.] Here's why Democrats benefit from the Should the U.S. Lengthen Its School Year? Should the GOP Dump Trump? About U.S. News.

And that leads us to the final and most important reason why patriotic Democrats and our elected leaders must dismiss this idea publicly and resolutely.

Follow the Rules: The nation’s founders purposefully made the constitution difficult to amend. They didn’t want hotheaded activists (or their favorite media outlets) changing the nation’s fate without rigorous dialogue and debate.

In other words, we can make changes to our electoral system but we must do it right. That means calling for either a constitutional convention or getting Congress to start the amendment process.

It’s clear, though, that extremists in the Democratic Party aren’t keen on doing things right. Why? They know that passing constitutional reforms is tough. Indeed, amendments almost always fail.

For them, that means there’s only one solution: cheating. They’re willing to treat the constitution like a downed tree to be cleared in order to secure the White House in 2020.

But if that’s what it takes to win, this Democrat would rather lose.

Joe Biden's Newest Project May Fuel 2020 Campaign Speculation .
Former Vice President Joe Biden is launching a new initiative to address issues facing American workers , ranging from education to health care to retirement. Biden said Monday that the Biden Institute at the University of Delaware is seeking ways to “transform” the American educational system so that it reaches people early, provides ample opportunity in a way that’s affordable, and gives people a chance to train and retrain for future jobs.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!