Opinion Even If Trump’s Threat Against NBC Isn’t Serious, It’s Still Destructive

00:05  12 october  2017
00:05  12 october  2017 Source:   The Federalist

Mattis: U.S. Should Not Break From Iran Deal

  Mattis: U.S. Should Not Break From Iran Deal <p>Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, an ardent critic of what he considers Iran's destructive activities in the Middle East, said Tuesday that the Trump administration should not break with the international agreement designed to limit Tehran's nuclear program.</p>Testifying before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mattis was asked by Sen. Angus King whether it was in the U.S. national security interest to remain with the deal, known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

As you know, we’re not supposed to take everything Trump says seriously . Sure, it ’ s more than likely the president’ s threat is nothing more than bluster. Even so, what the polls do illustrate is that our hierarchy of ideals has changed in destructive ways.

Michael Moore Pays The Price After Issuing Violent Threat Against Trump .

Even If Trump’s Threat Against NBC Isn’t Serious, It’s Still Destructive © The Federalist Even If Trump’s Threat Against NBC Isn’t Serious, It’s Still Destructive

Editor’s note: The opinions in this article are the author’s, as published by our content partner, and do not necessarily represent the views of MSN or Microsoft.

After NBC ran an article maintaining that the president had asked for the nuclear arsenal to be increased tenfold, Donald Trump, as is his wont, tweeted:

The answer, of course, is that it’s never appropriate for a person sworn to defend the Constitution to threaten to shut down political speech. Not even if that speech irritates him, or undermines his political priorities, or happens to be genuinely fake news. Trump might have framed his contention in the form of a question, but he’s clearly comfortable with regulatory restrictions on speech. This puts in him league with those who support “fairness doctrines,” those who want to overturn the Citizens United decision, and so on.

Backlash swift after Trump tweet on NBC

  Backlash swift after Trump tweet on NBC Many are saying that such a move would violate the First Amendment. Trump lashed out at NBC News Wednesday after the outlet reported that Trump had suggested increasing the nation's nuclear arms stockpile during a meeting with top Cabinet officials. "With all of the Fake News coming out of NBC and the Networks, at what point is it appropriate to challenge their License? Bad for country!" Trump wrote.While the idea was roundly criticized as a threat to the free press, many don't believe that the president would be able to follow through.

The website you were trying to reach is temporarily unavailable. If you are the owner of this website, please contact Technical Support as soon as possible.

This Account has been suspended.

When I tweeted critical comments about Trump’s “license” idea, a follower accused of me practicing “literal-ism.” This is not new. As you know, we’re not supposed to take everything Trump says seriously. Sure, it’s more than likely the president’s threat is nothing more than bluster. There is less of a chance that he’ll challenge the “licenses” of networks -- whatever that means; networks don’t function on licensing tied to the veracity of their reporting, obviously -- than there is of the GOP passing any meaningful bill. It’s just more fuel for the corrupt symbiotic relationship between the president and the establishment media. Each side can now preen for a cycle.

But none of this changes the fact that presidents do have the power to undermine your privacy and destroy your life over free expression. It doesn’t change the fact that when presidents play around with authoritarian ideas for political gain, a faction of Americans -- always a different faction, depending on who is doing the speaking -- are either comfortable hearing it or offer rationalizations for it. All the while we continue to abandon neutral principles for political gain.

California’s Wildfires: Why Have They Been So Destructive?

  California’s Wildfires: Why Have They Been So Destructive? The 17 major blazes raging in California have been much more ferocious than the state’s typical fire season, for reasons that were years in the making.Intense, fast-moving fires have been raging across much of California since Sunday night. The blazes have barreled through communities like freight trains, turning homes to dust in a blink and leaving at least 17 people dead. The largest of the fires are in the state’s wine country north of San Francisco.

Missing Topic. If you have any questions, please contact the site administrator. Click here to go back to previous page.

This Account has been suspended.

A forthcoming Cato Institute poll not only found that 50 percent of Democrats believe “government should prevent people from engaging in hate speech against certain groups in public” but that 53 percent believe defending someone else’s right “to say racist things” is tantamount to “holding racist views yourself.” It’s a position similar to the one that alleges anyone who supports due process for those accused of rape on college campuses is merely defending rape. Or, for that matter, it’s reminiscent of the position of Democratic senators who argue that Republicans’ demands for due process for gun owners make them no better than terrorists.

Recently, 200 staff members of the American Civil Liberties Union -- an organization that bills itself a defender of constitutional rights -- complained that the group’s “rigid stance” on the First Amendment was undermining its attempts to institute racial justice. Is this really the choice -- liberty or “justice”? For progressives, many of whom are abandoning liberalism, it seems the answer is yes.

Trump to give $1M to aid law enforcement after Las Vegas shooting

  Trump to give $1M to aid law enforcement after Las Vegas shooting President Trump announced on Wednesday that he will give money to Las Vegas to aid law enforcement in the wake of the recent mass shooting in the city. "Happy to announce we are awarding $1M to Las Vegas - in order to help local law enforcement working OT to respond to last Sunday's tragedy," Trump tweeted.Happy to announce we are awarding $1M to Las Vegas - in order to help local law enforcement working OT to respond to last Sunday's tragedy.- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 11, 2017 It remains unclear where the money for the donation will come from, or how exactly the funds will be used.

If you are the webmaster for this site, please contact your hosting provider' s support team for assistance.

Fatal error: Call to a member function _listing() on null in /var/www/client/core/lib/blogs.php on line 544.

But they’re not alone. The Cato poll finds that 72 percent of Republicans would support making it illegal to burn or desecrate the American flag. More than 50 percent of them believe, as Trump once suggested, that those who do should be stripped of their U.S. citizenship. Fifty percent of Republicans believe the press has too much freedom in America. Other polling has found similarly disturbing results.

To some extent, it is likely that answers in these polls are more about signaling on race and gender issues than supporting any specific policy. In the same way, many of the answers are likely an outlet for frustration over flag protests or the media. Even so, what the polls do illustrate is that our hierarchy of ideals has changed in destructive ways. Americans find free speech a secondary principle.

The entire “fake news” outrage -- from Trump’s usage to the Facebook election scare -- is an excuse for someone to limit speech. No, it doesn’t matter if most journalists now lecturing you about the First Amendment are a bunch of enormous hypocrites. Nor does matter that their biased coverage has eroded your trust. There is a bigger marketplace for news than ever. Don’t read NBC.

But even if you’re not idealistic about free expression, it might be worth remembering that any laws or regulations you embrace to inhibit the speech of others, even fake-news anchors, can one day be turned on you. This is the lesson big-government Democrats and Republicans never learn.

U.S. warns public about attacks on energy, industrial firms .
<p>The U.S government issued a rare public warning about hacking campaigns targeting energy and industrial firms, the latest evidence that cyber attacks present an increasing threat to the power industry and other public infrastructure.</p>The Department of Homeland Security and Federal Bureau of Investigation warned in a report distributed via email late on Friday that the nuclear, energy, aviation, water and critical manufacturing industries have been targeted along with government entities in attacks dating back to at least May.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!