Politics Republicans Search for Proof Their Tax Plans Will Pay for Themselves

03:05  13 november  2017
03:05  13 november  2017 Source:   The New York Times

Mitch McConnell says Senate GOP will release its tax proposal on Friday

  Mitch McConnell says Senate GOP will release its tax proposal on Friday McConnell said the Senate will aim to mark up, or debate and amend, the tax bill next week.

Republican leaders have said the tax cuts they are planning will essentially pay for themselves . Lawmakers gave themselves , via their 2018 budget resolution, space for .5 trillion in revenue losses from tax cuts

Republicans seek to absolve themselves by arguing that their plan actually would be fully paid for . It would jolt economic growth, they argue, which would result in a flood of new tax revenue. Independent analysts are rightly skeptical.

Mitch McConnell et al. standing next to a man in a suit and tie: Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, delivering remarks on Capitol Hill last week before a meeting on the Senate tax plan. © Tom Brenner/The New York Times Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader, delivering remarks on Capitol Hill last week before a meeting on the Senate tax plan.

WASHINGTON — Republican leaders keep insisting that their plans to cut taxes by $1.5 trillion over the next decade will not add to the national debt — yet economic analyses of the Senate and House proposals keep predicting that the plans will do just that.

The disconnect is prompting House and Senate Republican leaders and the Trump administration to hunt down — and promote — more optimistic forecasts, even if they exclude large parts of the tax bills from their analyses or assume growth-boosting features that are not, in fact, in the bills.

Senate Republicans Will Diverge From House in Sweeping Tax Rewrite

  Senate Republicans Will Diverge From House in Sweeping Tax Rewrite The Senate will diverge from the House legislation in several key ways, including eliminating the ability to deduct state and local taxes and scaling back, rather than ending, the estate tax.WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans, under pressure to pass a sweeping tax rewrite before year’s end, are expected to unveil legislation on Thursday that would eliminate the ability of people to deduct state and local taxes but would stop short of fully repealing the estate tax, according to lobbyists and other people familiar with the bill.

The Republican plan to make extreme cuts in Kansas’s taxes played by all the rules of conservative trickle-down theory, and made all the promises. When Brownback outlined his plan in 2012, he, too, said the tax cuts would pay for themselves .

The basic idea here is that massive tax cuts boost growth so much that they pay for themselves , and so But Rubio doesn't need to convince wonks that his tax plan will pay for itself (indeed, an But Romney was running at a moment when Republicans — as part of their backlash to various Obama

“When you’re in a political organization, you’re constantly model shopping,” said Kent Smetters, a former economic adviser in President George W. Bush’s administration, who is now the faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model at the University of Pennsylvania.

Sign Up For the Morning Briefing Newsletter

Republican leaders have said the tax cuts they are planning will essentially pay for themselves. Lawmakers gave themselves, via their 2018 budget resolution, space for $1.5 trillion in revenue losses from tax cuts, but they have promised those losses will be offset by increased economic growth spurred by the tax overhaul. Finding a model that supports the ambitious economic growth projections is critical to their ability to pass a tax cut along party lines.

Romney says he believes Roy Moore's accuser, calls on Senate candidate to step aside

  Romney says he believes Roy Moore's accuser, calls on Senate candidate to step aside <p>Mitt Romney, the former Republican presidential nominee and Massachusetts governor, weighed in on Friday on the sexual misconduct allegations facing Republican Senate nominee Roy Moore.</p>"Innocent until proven guilty is for criminal convictions, not elections. I believe Leigh Corfman. Her account is too serious to ignore," Romney wrote on Twitter. "Moore is unfit for office and should step aside.

LIVE: Watch MSNBC. TV Schedule. Search Videos. Digital Documentaries. Mnuchin declared yesterday, “The plan will pay for itself with growth.” Sure, tax policy has an impact on the economy, but every time Republicans have said tax cuts will pay for themselves through increased

Republican leaders reject criticism that their tax plan will add to the deficit. “All that’s doing is putting on blinders and pretending tax cuts will pay for themselves .” Rohit Kumar, a former top aide to Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, said Republicans should be careful when considering

The House and Senate bills have been introduced and amended at a rapid clip, and economists are only now beginning to plug their details into sophisticated models that predict how much additional growth the cuts might produce. So far, every so-called dynamic analysis that scrutinizes the full details of the bills and factors in economic growth finds that those plans would add at least $500 billion and as much as $1.7 trillion to the deficit.

In an interview on Friday, Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, said that “we’re confident that the $1.5 trillion gap would be filled” by economic growth. Mr. McConnell said the tax bill would add 0.4 percentage points to annual economic growth, though he did not cite a specific analysis suggesting that assertion. “So we believe this is a responsible budget and a responsible tax reform,” he said.

Speaker Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin insisted last week that the House bill would not add to the deficit, even after an analysis by the independent Tax Foundation, which uses a model that tends to find large growth effects from tax cuts, found that the bill would add $1 trillion to deficits over a decade.

Major differences in House, Senate tax proposals

  Major differences in House, Senate tax proposals The House and Senate tax overhaul plans are broadly similar, but crucial differences are creating headaches for Republican leaders determined to keep myriad interest groups and factions of the GOP satisfied.&nbsp;The most politically challenging decisions involve dealing with popular and widely used tax deductions, structuring tax cuts for business and balancing personal income tax rates between middle-class families and the rich.

Search . The chart on the left shows who benefits the most from each tax plan . After all, we already know they’ll just declare that their tax cuts will supercharge the economy and pay for themselves .

That would set up final votes in November or early December, assuming Republicans can remain unified on their plan . But Corker said tax writers need to do away with costly tax breaks and benefits to help pay for rate cuts that he thinks will cost far more than leaders expect.

“We believe that we’re going to be fine on that,” Mr. Ryan said. “We believe that when you look at other analysis, whether it’s going to be Treasury or the rest, that we’re right there in the sweet spot, with economic growth that gives us more revenue with where we need to be.”

The House is preparing to vote on a tax overhaul bill this week, while the Senate Finance Committee begins amending a companion version, as part of a whirlwind push to deliver tax legislation to President Trump’s desk by Christmas.

The Treasury Department has not yet released any economic analysis of the congressional plans. Economists at Goldman Sachs said last month that they expect tax cuts to generate enough additional growth to offset about a fifth of their revenue losses. That means $1 trillion of net tax cuts would lose $800 billion on a dynamic basis.

Dynamic scoring is inexact in the best of circumstances. Under the compressed congressional schedule this fall, it is even more difficult, said Alan J. Auerbach, a University of California, Berkeley, economist who is widely considered a godfather of modern dynamic scoring models.

The Republican tax reform bill will live and die by this obscure Senate rule

  The Republican tax reform bill will live and die by this obscure Senate rule Remember the Byrd Rule?

No, Trump’s Tax Cuts Won’t Pay for Themselves . And lately, tax -cutters have largely gotten their way on this point. In 2015, Republicans in control of Congress ordered two key in-house government research agencies — the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation — to

A few days later, Jeb Bush and Donald Trump largely conceded their economic plans would increase the deficit. No serious person seriously believes tax cuts can pay for themselves – and that includes the man congressional Republicans recently chose to lead the Congressional Budget Office.

As a result, only a few models have churned out consistent dynamic analyses that attempt to account for all the provisions of the House and Senate bills. The Tax Foundation has one. Mr. Smetters and his Penn Wharton team have another. Perhaps the most important scorekeeper on that front, the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, is due to weigh in this week, with an analysis of the bill pending in the House.

Ironically, the models that so far have produced the least optimistic forecasts for the Republican plan are the ones that most closely track the assumptions conservatives have long espoused about the economy: that racking up deficits and debt will hold back growth.

That is the case with the Penn Wharton model, which finds that the House bill would lose between $1 trillion and $1.7 trillion over a decade in revenue, after accounting for growth, depending on various assumptions about the flow of investment dollars in the global economy and the growth-stoking power of tax cuts. The Tax Foundation’s more optimistic model projects the Senate bill would lose $500 billion in revenue after growth effects.

Other economists have produced optimistic effects based on approximations of a bill Congress might eventually agree upon. On Friday, Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Gordon Gray of the conservative American Action Forum released an analysis that attempts to mirror the joint committee’s methodology, but that models a bill with smaller net tax cuts than in the Republican plans. It found such a plan could cost as little as $310 billion over a decade.

Nearly 1.5 million sign up for ObamaCare in first 11 days

  Nearly 1.5 million sign up for ObamaCare in first 11 days Nearly 1.5 million people signed up for ObamaCare in the first 11 days of open enrollment, nearly 500,000 more than at the same time last year.&nbsp;According to numbers released Wednesday by the Trump administration, 876,788 people signed up for plans in week two of open enrollment, which spanned from Nov. 5 to Nov. 11.

When House Republicans unveiled their new tax bill on Thursday, Speaker Paul Ryan declared that the plan would deliver “real relief” for the middle class and Americans “striving to But it would also eliminate the personal exemptions that taxpayers take for themselves and each of their dependents.

Business tax cuts are the heart and soul of the Republican tax plan , the It would create a special 25 percent rate for pass-through businesses, whose owners currently pay taxes on their profits as normal personal This is similar to the position Republicans found themselves in on health care earlier this

The one model so far to suggest that the bills could fully pay for themselves comes from a Boston University economist, Laurence J. Kotlikoff, who employs what he calls a more comprehensive view of the global economy’s dynamics than other economists do. Mr. Kotlikoff’s analysis finds large growth effects from the House and Senate’s plans to cut top corporate tax rates to 20 percent from 35 percent today. It makes some growth-boosting assumptions that differ from the bills as drafted, and it essentially excludes the impacts of personal income tax changes on the economy; other models find those changes would affect growth and revenue.

Mr. Kotlikoff’s approach has been criticized by several liberal economists, including Jason Furman, a former top economist for President Barack Obama, who now gives slide-show presentations on what he calls the “seven deadly sins of overly optimistic dynamic scoring.”

Mr. Kotlikoff’s model commits several of those sins, Mr. Furman said, including Sin No. 2: “Use estimates from ‘similar’ tax plans that are not similar.”

Last week, Mr. Kotlikoff was on the phone with a reporter, explaining the intricacies of his model, when a call came in on the other line from a staff member of the House Ways and Means Committee.

“They’re interested because it supports their view, right?” Mr. Kotlikoff said, referring to the Ways and Means staff member. He then resumed explaining why that should be the case — why his model was better than others at predicting the path of growth.

Mr. Auerbach, who has teamed up with Mr. Kotlikoff on past tax studies, but not the current effort, said he was skeptical that the Republican plans would generate enough growth and revenue to pay for themselves. “To say that it might happen is one thing,” he said. “To say you expect it to happen is quite different.”

Mr. Auerbach cautioned that he was speaking from informed opinion — and not from the results of any modeling.

U.S. Navy aircraft to join search for missing Argentine submarine .
The U.S. Navy said Saturday it is joining the search for an Argentine navy submarine with a 44-person crew that has been out of radio contact for several days. U.S. Southern Command has directed the Navy to deploy a P-8A Poseidon to help in the search for the submarine, which was on a routine mission when it went missing.&nbsp;The U.S. Navy said Saturday it is joining the search for an Argentine navy submarine with a 44-person crew that has been out of radio contact for several days.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!