Sport Ruling expected to help Redskins in fight over name

18:41  19 june  2017
18:41  19 june  2017 Source:   Associated Press

Turkey's Erdogan says to fight back against U.S. arrest warrants for his security - CNN Turk

  Turkey's Erdogan says to fight back against U.S. arrest warrants for his security - CNN Turk Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan will fight back politically against the arrest warrants issued by U.S. authorities for his security personnel, broadcaster CNN Turk quoted him as saying on Thursday. Washington prosecutors have charged a dozen Turkish security and police officers with assault after an attack on protesters during Erdogan's visit to the U.S. capital last month, officials said.CNN Turk gave no further details of Erdogan's comments. However, the pro-government Daily Sabah newspaper quoted him as saying: "We will do everything, politically, diplomatically, to resolve it.

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Monday struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Redskins in their legal fight over the team name .

On Monday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit weighed in on "disparaging" trademarks, and in a somewhat confounding outcome, ruled against an Asian-American band attempting to register the mark "The Circuit's opinion over The Slants is sure to influence the Redskins ' own appeal.

FILE - In this Sept. 18, 2016 file photo, a Washington Redskins helmet is seen on the sidelines during the first half of an NFL football game against the Dallas Cowboys in Landover, Md. The Supreme Court on Monday, June 19, 2017, struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. (AP Photo/Nick Wass, File)© The Associated Press FILE - In this Sept. 18, 2016 file photo, a Washington Redskins helmet is seen on the sidelines during the first half of an NFL football game against the Dallas Cowboys in Landover, Md. The Supreme Court on Monday, June 19, 2017, struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name. (AP Photo/Nick Wass, File) WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name.

1991 Redskins labeled again as ‘Greatest Team Ever’

  1991 Redskins labeled again as ‘Greatest Team Ever’ The 1991 Washington Redskins have been recognized over the years as the greatest team ever. USA TODAY hailed the '91 Super Bowl winning unit as the best team in NFL history. That narrative continues as Football Outsiders - content is published on ESPN - using a measurement called DVOA (defense-adjusted value over average) recognized the 1991 Redskins as the best team over the past 30 seasons.

no page selected Klimt garden painting expected to sell for over €53m at auction.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday struck down part of a law that bans offensive trademarks in a ruling that is expected to help the Washington Redskins in their legal fight over the team name .

The justices ruled that the 71-year-old trademark law barring disparaging terms infringes free speech rights.

The ruling is a victory for the Asian-American rock band called the Slants, but the case was closely watched for the impact it would have on the separate dispute involving the Washington football team.

Slants founder Simon Tam tried to trademark the band name in 2011, but the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office denied the request on the ground that it disparages Asians. A federal appeals court in Washington later said the law barring offensive trademarks is unconstitutional.

The Redskins made similar arguments after the trademark office ruled in 2014 that the name offends American Indians and canceled the team's trademark. A federal appeals court in Richmond put the team's case on hold while waiting for the Supreme Court to rule in the Slants case.

Note to NFL: Redskins do not play in Washington state

  Note to NFL: Redskins do not play in Washington state The NFL Shop is offering state license plates, with NFL logos superimposed on an outline of the state. The "Official Online Shop of the NFL" is offering a line of state license plates featuring NFL logos. Each plate features a state outline, with the logo of an NFL team from the state superimposed over the image.

Not found 1 - 'voa/news/2013'. 2013-11-14 Native American Campaign Keeps Redskins Name Controversy

The long-running battle over the Washington Redskins name got a restart Thursday, when a group of Native Americans went before the Trademark Trial and Lawyers said they expect the judges to take as long as a year to issue a ruling , and the Redskins are sure to appeal if it doesn’t go their way.

In his opinion for the court, Justice Samuel Alito rejected arguments that trademarks are government speech, not private speech. Alito also said trademarks are not immune from First Amendment protection as part of a government program or subsidy.

Tam insisted he was not trying to be offensive, but wanted to transform a derisive term into a statement of pride. The Redskins also contend their name honors American Indians, but the team has faced decades of legal challenges from Indian groups that say the name is racist.

Despite intense public pressure to change the name, Redskins owner Dan Snyder has refused, saying it "represents honor, respect and pride."

In the Slants case, government officials argued that the law did not infringe on free speech rights because the band was still free to use the name even without trademark protection. The same is true for the Redskins, but the team did not want to lose the legal protections that go along with a registered trademark. The protections include blocking the sale of counterfeit merchandise, and working to pursue a brand development strategy.

Japan passes anti-terror conspiracy law

  Japan passes anti-terror conspiracy law <p>Japan's lawmakers have passed a controversial bill allowing authorities to target terror conspiracies.</p>PM Shinzo Abe's ruling bloc pushed it through the upper house early on Thursday, despite vocal opposition.

This Account has been suspended.

Error 404: Page Not Found. John Almquist with Fairfax Co. Schools Discusses Concussion Rules .

A federal appeals court had sided with the Slants in 2015, saying First Amendment protects "even hurtful speech that harms members of oft-stigmatized communities."

RELATED SLIDESHOW: Top 2017 draft picks (provided by USA TODAY Sports)

The 2017 NFL Draft: <p>The 2017 NFL draft prospects pose before the start of the first round the 2017 NFL Draft at Philadelphia Museum of Art.</p> 2017 NFL Draft: The Top Picks

How much will it cost to watch Mayweather vs. McGregor? .
The late-summer showdown between undefeated boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr. and UFC fighter Conor McGregor has generated nothing but hype since it was announced Wednesday evening. And while the fight itself may not ultimately live up to its billing, you can expect ticket and Showtime pay-per-view prices to approach record highs. Specific numbers for both are yet to be determined, but a good guide to the Aug. 26 fight would be Mayweather’s bout against Manny Pacquiao in 2015. That cost viewers $99.95 on Showtime and HBO. In-person tickets for that fight cost between $1,500 and $7,500 before resale, and sold out in a flash.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!