US California judge overturns End of Life Option Law

22:28  16 may  2018
22:28  16 may  2018 Source:   cnn.com

Would recall of Stanford rape case judge threaten the rule of law?

  Would recall of Stanford rape case judge threaten the rule of law? Judge Aaron Persky caused outrage with a short sentence for a convicted sex offender, former Stanford swimmer Brock TurnerToday Persky is making his first on-camera comments since handing down that controversial sentence – his latest attempt to convince an already-skeptical public, reports CBS News correspondent John Blackstone. He has just four weeks left to avoid becoming the first California judge in 86 years kicked off the bench by voters. He became a recall target after he sentenced Turner to six months in the county jail for sexually assaulting an unconscious woman.

5. PRAY that 1) the people trying to overturn the law do not succeed 2) that after California Hospital Assocation detailed information on End of Life Option Act. California Dept. of Health Report, first six months of the End of Life Option Act. And, a group is waging a legal fight against the law .

(Reuters) - A California judge on Friday refused to suspend a new state law allowing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, citing the need A group of doctors in Riverside, east of Los Angeles, filed a lawsuit to overturn the so-called California End of Life Option , which was passed

  California judge overturns End of Life Option Law © Shutterstock

A California superior court judge on Tuesday overturned a 2016 state law that allows doctors to prescribe lethal drugs to terminally ill adult patients.

Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia said The End of Life Option Act, which took effect June 9, 2016, was unconstitutional because the Legislature passed it during a special session convened by Gov. Jerry Brown to address health care-related issues.

Groups including the Life Legal Defense Foundation and the American Academy of Medical Ethics filed a lawsuit to overturn the law on the day it took effect. In a separate motion, they argued that medical aid in dying was not related to the stated purpose of the special legislative session that passed the act, explained Alexandra Snyder, executive director of the Life Legal Defense Foundation.

California judge finalizes ruling on coffee cancer warnings

  California judge finalizes ruling on coffee cancer warnings A Los Angeles judge has finalized a ruling that Starbucks Corp and other coffee sellers must serve up a cancer warning with coffee sold in California. Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle in a ruling published on Monday said that Starbucks and other coffee sellers did not show that the risk from consuming acrylamide, a probable cancer-causing byproduct created during coffee roasting, was offset by benefits from drinking coffee.

On October 5, 2015 California Govenor Jerry Brown signed Bill ABx2 15 titled " End of Life Option Act" into law , which gives terminally ill patients the option to end their own life .

in California failed to collect enough signatures to qualify a measure overturning the newly-passed ABX2-15, End of Life Option Act, for the November ballot. — California Governor Jerry Brown. The law will work just like Oregon’s or Washington’s The Future of End of Life Options in California .

Ottolia agreed, stating in his decision that the law did not fall within the scope of the special legislative session, Snyder said. He also gave the state attorney general five days to file an emergency writ, a type of appeal, to seek a stay and keep the law in place.

California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement, "We strongly disagree with this ruling and the State is seeking expedited review in the Court of Appeal."

If the emergency appeal is denied, the law will be immediately struck down.

Many believe that California's End of Life Option was a response, in part, to a viral video of Brittany Maynard, a Californian with terminal brain cancer. Wanting to end her life, the 29-year-old moved to Oregon in June 2014 to take advantage of that state's medical aid-in-dying law. Maynard's family advocated for the law in California and elsewhere.

Media seek documents in California serial killer case

  Media seek documents in California serial killer case A judge is considering whether to make public search and arrest warrants for a man who authorities call one of California's most elusive serial killers. DeAngelo is due back in court Monday, May 14, for a routine hearing. (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File) SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A judge is set to consider Monday whether to make public search and arrest warrants for a man who authorities call one of California' Joseph James DeAngelo, 72, is due back in court for a routine hearing, while lawyers battle over unsealing records preceding the arrest of the former police officer.

Patients and healthcare professionals alike have questions about the End of Life Option Act and how it is being implemented in California . Signed into law by Governor Brown in October 2015, the law went into effect on June 9, 2016.

Judge Gregory Pollack dismissed a lawsuit challenging California ’s law against assisted suicide as if he personally felt the current situation was ideal but that it was not for him to overturn the law . at the end of their lives that no medication can alleviate, to have the option of medical aid in dying.”

A California Department of Public Health report says 191 adults received prescriptions from 173 physicians for medical aid in dying between the law's passage and December 31, 2016. Of those, 111 ingested the prescribed drugs and died; 87.4% were 60 or older, and 83.8% were receiving hospice and/or palliative care.

Compassion & Choices, a nonprofit advocacy group for end-of-life options that made the video featuring Maynard, estimated that 504 California adults had received life-ending drugs from their doctors between the law's passage and June 2017.

The judge's ruling "is not a surprise, as the End of Life Option Act entered review by the legislature through an abnormal path," said Dr. Stephanie Harman, a clinical associate professor in Stanford University's Department of Medicine and a faculty member in the Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics.

"We have seen more patients than we initially expected participating in the End of Life Option Act," said Harman, who was not involved in the lawsuit but has written about Stanford Health Care's experiences with the law.

Riverside judge overturns California's doctor-assisted suicide law

  Riverside judge overturns California's doctor-assisted suicide law A Riverside County judge overturned California's physician-assisted suicide law on Tuesday, giving the state attorney general five days to file an appeal to keep the law in place. California's law, which allows terminally ill patients to request lethal medications from their doctors, has been the subject of fierce and emotional debates since it was approved in 2015. The state was the fifth in the nation to legalize the practice.Superior Court Judge Daniel A.

Early Friday Riverside County Superior Court Judge Daniel A. Ottolia denied the request for an injunction filed by a group of anti-choice physicians against the California End of Life Option Act. This means the newest Death with Dignity law remains in place and eligible terminally ill Californians can

(Reuters) - A California judge on Friday refused to suspend a new state law allowing physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients but allowed a A group of doctors in Riverside, east of Los Angeles, are seeking in a lawsuit to overturn the so-called California End of Life Option , which was

She added that Stanford patients have mostly responded positively to the law. Primarily, patients "want to discuss what matters most at the end of their lives and understand what their options are and what will align best with their wishes," she said.

Meanwhile, there's the other side of the equation: physician participation. "Doctors, by the generic polls, have been generally supportive; in practice, very few participate," she said.

Dr. David Stevens, executive director of the American Academy of Medical Ethics, a national organization that has advocated against medically assisted suicide since 1994, said the End of Life Option Act "isn't about giving patients the right to die. This is about giving doctors the right to assist in killing."

He believes that physician-assisted suicide is "dangerous for the health care profession. It destroys trust between the doctor and the patient."

Worse, for patients, "the so-called right to die very quickly becomes the duty to die," Stevens said.

Only a handful of states have authorized medically assisted suicide: California, Colorado, Montana, Oregon, Vermont and Washington, in addition to the District of Columbia.

In California, opponents including Catholic leaders and medical groups defeated a 1992 initiative to legalize aid-in-dying and stalled other bills in the state Legislature. Opponents argue that these laws could lead to coercion and abuse of vulnerable patients.

CNN's Stella Chan contributed to this report.

California's physician-assisted suicide law is overturned — for now .
LOS ANGELES - Nearly two years after it was enacted, California's physician-assisted suicide law is, at least for the moment, no longer in effect. A Riverside County judge who ruled against the law last week issued a formal judgment Friday deeming it unconstitutional. Legal experts said that meant the law had been overturned. The law allowed patients who are terminally ill to request life-ending medications from their doctors. In the first six months it was in effect, more than 100 Californians, most of them suffering from cancer, used it to take their lives.

—   Share news in the SOC. Networks

Topical videos:

This is interesting!